I never could get Art.
For me, it was always an ‘F’ away
from what I really thought it was.
I mean, while the world goes ga-ga
over the “Mona Lisa”, I fail to see what all the excitement is about – I mean,
is it only me who see a badly colored picture (instagram anyone?) of some
middle aged woman, who had bad hair, a half-drunk smile and clearly no sex
appeal (seriously, you call that a cleavage!)?
Or even that painting called "The Scream" (above), supposedly the most expensive painting ever bought. Really??? Am I missing something here or doesn't it look like something my 3 year old niece drew? If she did, then we're pressing charges as she did not get any of the $119 million that it was reportedly sold for.
Art around me has definitely changed
with time – when I was a kid, a painting of a woman actually looked like one
(recall Raja Ravi Verma paintings); then came ‘modern art’- with shockingly
explicit and gleeful nudity that clearly dispelled all doubts about the gender
(ya baby, it was a woman alright! J) ; and finally there’s abstract art, where there were just geometric shapes
arranged in some vague fashion that the celebrity painter successfully
convinced everyone in the gallery that it really was a woman. Except me of
course - I still think it was just shapes from a gigantic high school
instrument box arranged in well, a very random way.
So all my life, I was pretty
convinced that an art aficionado, I was not destined to become; in fact, when I
was to choose graduation after high school, I opted out of the one that had
‘Art’ in the nomenclature and went ahead for other option - ‘engineering’
(great idea that turned to be.)
So I joined a writer’s workshop called
the Bangalore Writers Workshop recently. And when they started the course with
an exercise called “Art inspires art”, my first reaction was total panic. The idea of the exercise was to intensely
look at the many paintings in their art gallery, so that we may get so
“inspired” that we could repaint the pictures into our books with our
words. Maybe my undying sense of
optimism failed me that day (as has been the case all my life, in matters of
the Art), but I was immediately gripped by an acute sense of dreadful fear when
this exercise was announced. My mind
started asking myself scary questions like “”what if these paintings were the
“modern kind” or even worse, what if they were, oh my God, “abstract”?”,
“What if I could find nothing in them?”, “What if other people would discover my
ignorance?”, “ What if…..? ”
I was petrified……
So I reluctantly walked around the
small gallery trying to find the painters’ profound purports in each of the
portraits. I found none. I looked around at the other participants and
they seem to have been pretty much “inspired” by the paintings. Pramodini fell in love with a painting that
was supposedly of a flower, which someone else claimed was jasmine – I looked
at the “flower” and all I could see was stale upma. Rhea gazed intensely into the paintings
trying to find deeper meaning within the shades – I tried doing the same and
surprisingly, I did manage to discover some sort of life on the painting – I
moved closer to the painting but the fly flew away. Arun peered pensively into the paintings,
scribbled down something into his notebook and marched confidently to the next
- my immediate thought was “Steal his notebook and run!” But I did nothing of the same – he looked
fitter than me and could easily outrun me.
Also he had muscles.
Everyone in the room seemed to have
found something new by simply looking at the paintings. Everyone except
me. I was almost “art-broken” when
Kishore unwittingly came to my rescue.
Kishore pointed to one of the paintings and said it was not exactly a
painting but actually a collage. I
looked at the Ganesha painting and saw that he was right. And then it struck me! The cupid of Inspiration (if there is such a
person) had finally shot me with his inspiration- waala arrow.
I was inspired – I could see more than upma,
I could see more than flies, I could see more than before. And with my new found “inspiration”, I looked
around the gallery with renewed sight. I
still saw nothing.
Damn.
But yet, I did manage to find another
painting that was also, similarly different – this painting had real buttons
pasted on the canvas such that they represented the keys of a typewriter. The
paper coming out of the typewriter’s paper roll had sketches of multiple number
of people.
And then it struck me – in the midst
of all those paintings that made no sense to me, the ones that stuck to my mind
were the ones that stood out. And I realized that it is the case in real life
too – usually, it’s the people - God’s greatest portraits, (ah thank you! J ) - who
are different that stand out in life.
And that Saturday night, my dinner friend, who is a recruiter by
profession, agreed with me that evening that it’s usually the ones who stand
out in the interview, that eventually get selected. And if you look closely at life, the men who’ve
made it (and women of course) seem to have an extra “something” that sets them apart from
the crowd, and it’s usually that “something” that propels them further
forward. And my recruiter friend goes on
by adding that everyone has a unique “something” about themselves; we just need
to take the time and effort to find what it is, hone and nurture it and slowly
let that “something” drive our lives forward to wine, wealth and wisdom (and
the odd woman or two…. J).
So in conclusion, I guess that art does inspire art. Rather in this case, I think that art
inspires life. But thinking out loud,
wasn’t art inspired by life in the first place?
So it should be that life inspires art, isn’t it?? Or isn’t it that………….?
I never could get Art.